@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: Besonders interessant ist übrigens, dass die postmodernen Ideologien (aka #Wokeness) der sog. #SocialJusticeWarriors miteinander zusammenhängen. Charakteristisch für die #Woke-Linken ist etwa ihre grosse Liebe zum Islamismus. Je radikaler, umso besser. In der Szene wird die Burka… [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@GenePerlich [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: #woke #nike #women #GirlPower #lhbtqia+
I wish everyone his or her joy and love in their life. but girls getting confused, I can imagine why.
Best girl motivation ad …. About a decade ago
1/3 [URL redacted]
#BrandProcterAndGambleAlways
#CampaignHashtagLikeAGirlhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yLXrWLvwAo
#LiteralMessagingPersuasionAdvertisingContext
#TheoryFemvertisinghttps://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/oct/12/femvertising-branded-feminism And
https://dlib.bc.edu/islandora/object/bc-ir:107483/datastream/PDF/ ? And
#TheorySociologyRecuperation "'recuperation' [...] was a means of describing how the ideas of radical social movements are taken up but emptied of their political force and tied back to normative notions" (Akane Kanai and Rosalind Gill, p.13): Hoad-Reddick, Kate, 'Pitching the Feminist Voice: A Critique of Contemporary Consumer Feminism' (2017). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5093. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5093
#TheoryPerformativeCommodityFeminism[Wikipedia]Supplementary
#EDUAUUniversityOfNewSouthWalesUNSWNoelaDavis "Judith Butler's theory of the constitution of subjectivity conceptualizes the subject as a performative materialization of its social environment. In her theory Butler utilizes Louis Althusser's notion of interpellation, and she critiques the constitutive paradoxes to which its tautological framing leads. Although there is no pre-existing subject, as it is constituted in the turn to the interpellative hail, Butler nonetheless theorizes a guilt and compulsion acting on an 'individual' that compels his or her turn to answer the hail. There is a price to pay for subjectivity in Butler's schema: the reprimand of the interpellative law that punishes at the same time as it constitutes. But a return to Althusser's text finds that he does not rely so much on coercion and guilt in his explanation of the subject's answer to the hail. Althusser can instead be read as suggesting that we are already an instantiation and enactment of power-ideology and, to paraphrase Michel Foucault, are already the principle of our own 'subjection.' This contests the notion that we are in any way compelled to submit to an external, punitive force to become subjects. As subjects, we are always-already the embodiment of the field of society-power-ideology (p.881). ...
The potential of interpellation as the basis for a performative theory of subjectivity lies in its being a naming that constitutes the subject it so names. There is no subject before this naming; that is, interpellation does not describe a pre-existing or given subject which then internalizes or appropriates its subjectifying conditions. Instead, interpellation gives an account of the genesis of the subject; that is, of the subject as an already subjectified, and thus social, being.
In The Psychic Life of Power, Butler examines Althusser's scenario of interpellation, aiming to give a 'symptomatic' reading of his text, a reading that will show the 'invisible' within it (Butler 1997b, 113). The scene of interpellation that Butler critiques in Althusser describes a hailing that transforms 'individuals into subjects' (Althusser 1971, 174). In his example, a policeman in the street calls out 'Hey, you there!' The mysterious qualities of this call are revealed as Althusser observes that the one so hailed turns around in response, and 'nine times out of ten it is the right one' who turns. In turning, the respondent 'becomes a subject' by recognizing that 'the hail was 'really' addressed to him' (174-75; original emphasis). In her reading, Butler highlights the enigmatic nature of such a suggestion, noting the 'paradoxical' elements of these processes of subject-formation (subjectivation) (Butler 1997b, 1). This arises because, in describing this scene, we must speak as if there is something that responds and turns to answer the hail, yet because interpellation constitutes the subject, there is no subject-no 'who'--to hear and respond to the call. In giving this account we must thus 'refer to what does not yet exist' (4), and are confronted with the difficulty of explaining what turns to answer, how 'it' recognizes the call, and why it turns (p.882)." Noela Davis (2012). 'Subjected Subjects? On Judith Butler's Paradox of Interpellation.' Hypatia 27(4): 881-897. [academic source]
#JournalHypatia
#IRLPhilosopherLouisAlthusser i.e.
#TheoryInterpellation
#IRLPhilosopherJudithButler,
#IRLPhilosopherMichelFoucault And
#TheoryPerformativeSocialEnvironmentMaterialization
#1997_ThePsychicLifeOfPower
#TheorySubjectivation
[543]
Archived on 5 April 2023 at 11:45am [URL redacted]
@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: "Understanding Hamas, Hezbollah as social movements that are progressive, that are on the Left, that are part of a global Left, is extremely important."
- Judith Butler, Erfinderin der #QueerTheory Ideologie, Chefideologin der #Woke-Linken
Quelle: [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: Understanding #Hamas, #Hezbollah as social movements that are progressive, that are on the Left, that are part of a #globalLeft, is extremely important.
Quelle: [URL redacted]
- #JudithButler, Chef-Ideologin der #Woke-Bewegung, Miterfinderin der #QueerTheory Ideologie [URL redacted]
@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: @laStaempfli @lisapaus Gibt es noch Zweifel, dass Judith Butlers #QueerTheory Ideologie nicht nur #homophob und #misogyn ist, sondern auch totalitär? #Woke #Totalitarismus #HannahArendt [URL redacted]
@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: “understanding Hamas, Hezbollah as social movements that are progressive, that are on the Left, that are part of a global Left, is extremely important.” -Judith Butler, Chefideologin der #Woke-Bewegung & gerngesehener Interviewgast beim #woke-linken @tagesanzeiger [URL redacted]
@RyanBuenconsejo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [40]: Nur so nebenbei:Einen positiven Bezug zur schiitischen Terrororganisation #Hizbollah hat nicht nur Emily Dische-Becker, die von der @documenta_ als #Antisemitismus-Beraterin eingesetzt wurde. Judith Butler, Oberguru der #Woke-Sekte, ist ein bekanntes Hizbollah- & #Hamas Fangirl. [URL redacted]
@AngelicaOch [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : The 2021 #Holberg Debate: "Identity Politics and Culture Wars" [URL redacted] via @YouTube, with Judith Butler, Cornell West, & Glenn Greenwald; Simon Critchley chairs #IdentityPolitics #CancelCulture #woke
#2021_TheHolbergDebate "Does identity politics as it is currently manifesting itself offer a suitable avenue towards social justice, or has it become a recipe for cultural antagonism, political polarization, and new forms of injustice?" https://holbergprisen.no/en/2021-holberg-debate-identity-politics-and-culture-wars And
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv-TXOfI7vg
#IRLPhilosopherJudithButler #IRLScholarCornelWest #IRLScholarSimonCritchley #NewspaperUSBrdshtNewYorkTimesGlennGreenwald #CatchcryCancelCulture #CatchcryIdentityPolitics #MetaphorWarfareCultureContext
"A fierce debate over social justice and identity-based politics seems to have exploded in recent years in the Western world, and few areas of life remain untouched by cultural conflicts. To some, identity-based politics has been embraced as an effective strategy to combat discrimination and marginalization. To others, it may seem that identity politics has resulted in culture wars involving violent conflicts and a destructive exchange of labels.
Identity-based politics often relate to volatile issues such as abortion, homosexuality, transgender rights, pornography, multiculturalism and racism. Identity conflicts also involve fundamental orientations such as religion and ideology, as well as political issues ranging from freedom of speech to the distribution of wealth and privilege.
Debates on these issues have challenged established views on equality and brought about an alternative demand for identity-based equity as a better approach. Even the term identity politics itself is debated, as many will contend that it is inherently biased and used by those who oppose struggles for social justice by marginalized groups.
Regardless of one's position on the current culture wars, it seems apparent that they involve both struggles for social justice and struggles for power."
[859]
Archived on 31 October 2021 at 2:30pm [URL redacted]
@DillonShaklee [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [03]: Die größten #Frauenfeinde sind nicht nur Männer, sondern auch #Frauen, solche #Maenner, die behaupten Frauen zu sein und #woke #Subjekte, die sich den ganzen Tag solche diffamierenden Begriffe wie "#TERF" ausdenken. #Identitaetspolitik. [URL redacted]
@ChristineRohlf [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [03]: 🗣️ Nouvelle étude @Fondapol | L'idéologie #woke | par @Valent1Pierre
Cette étude vise à analyser l’influence croissante de ce système de croyances sur nos sociétés occidentales.
1️⃣ Anatomie du wokisme [URL redacted]
2️⃣ Face au wokisme [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@JaelynNajar [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [04]: @bsoenensvrt @ElsAmpe #woke #socialjustice en diens postmodernistische afbreuk van de realiteit dringt ook de disciplines van biologie en psychologie binnen en veroorzaakt een theoretische afsplitsing die erg lijkt op het creationisme van christelijk rechts in de vs, de gevolgen zijn al zichtbaar [URL redacted]
"To be honest, the biggest threat to biologists right now. as I see it. are trans activists. Back when evolution was under attach from Creationists and Intelligent Design proponents. academics were under no pressure to hold back our criticisms of them. This is because these anti-evolution movements were almost exclusively a product of conservative evangelicals. But now we have a big problem. because anti-evolutionism is back, but it's coming from the Left in the form of denial of gender or sex differences in humans. I can't tell you how many people I hear say "sex is a social construct". now. And what's frightening is that I am hearing this come from biologists too. There is a growing number of biologists, mostly younger graduate students, that put their activism before their biology. And as a biologist myself, I can't even comprehend how anyone can deny the realiry of biological sex and claim to be a biologist. It's insane. There are many articles out now that seem to be trying to disseminate the idea that biologists don't really know what we're talking about regarding sex. They obfuscate things. and say that it's all just so complex. What they're essentially doing is describing how complex the developmental processes leading to males, females. and intersex people are, and then claiming that this complexiry means we have no clue what sex really is. They fail to mention that the end products of development are unambiguously male or female over 99.9. of the time. I wouldn't be able to do my job as an evolutionary biologist if sex weren't a real biological phenomenon. Yet I could lose my job for stating these plain facts. Combating evolution denial wasn't a problem when it was coming from the Right, but I apparently can't defend my own field now because this denialism is now coming from the Left. Aren't I supposed to be a science educator? Isn't outreach supposed to be part of my job? Now I can't even defend my own field without fear of losing my job. Unbelievable.
And I must note that I am quite liberal and support trans people and their rights entirely. But if jettisoning the reality of biological sex is necessary for me to be a good ally, then I can never be a good ally. I can never subordinate truth to narrative, and we shouldn't have to."
#TheoryDeterminismBiologicalGenetic #BeliefTheismCreationism #ReasoningAnalogicalIntelligentDesignID #TheoryDarwinismNaturalSelection #BeliefTheismChristianityDenomEvangelicalismSupplementary "So all language has world-building properties. Judith Butler argues, 'Genders can be neither true nor false, neither real nor apparent, neither original or derived' (Leitch, V. B., 2010). To call oneself 'woman' or 'man' is not simply a constative utterance, a linguistic marking of a natural congruence between body and gender; the so-called natural congruence of body and gender depends upon the repetition of the utterance, and the assumption of a neutral body, like a blank canvas, with its 'mute facticity.' Mute facticity is in this case 'sex,' a category often taken for granted as natural. However, this facticity is not itself mute, but is dependent on the muteness of the body in question, always already penetrated by countless lines of discourse, destroyed and 'fully transvaluated into a sublimated domain of values' (Leitch, V. B., 2010)." [blog]
Leitch, V. B. (2010). 'The Norton Anthology of Theory and Criticism' (Second edition). W.W. Norton & Company.
#IRLPhilosopherJudithButler
#PleaNeutralityMuteFacticity
@JamesKlobucher [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [06]: @estherk_k Also becase according to #woke mentality, you can be any race you want!
#transracial [URL redacted]