"This one-dimensional feminism à la Schwarzer is passé. He makes the western white middle-class woman the new universal subject (which was previously the western white middle-class man), and overlooks that in doing so he himself excludes the majority of all women."
Context #IRLScholarStefanManserEgli "Building on this, his PhD thesis inquires into what has been called 'boundary liberalism', 'repressive liberalism' and 'illiberal' or 'Schmittian liberalism'. These concepts refer to the fact that the extent to which immigrants are believed to have acceptably liberal values has become a site of boundary making in Western Europe with 'integration' increasingly being predicated on the adoption of liberal-democratic norms and practices and assumptions underpinning liberal personhood. This boundary making in the name of liberal ideals often ends up having its own illiberal thrust. From a historical, social science and political philosophy perspective, the aim of this thesis is thus to empirically work out social imaginaries of 'liberalism' and 'society' behind the boundary making in the name of 'integration' and to discuss them in light of the philosophy of political liberalism."
http://www.unine.ch/maps-chaire/home/import/stefan-manser-egli.html
Addendum presumably this is more an attack on the hegemony of traditional conceptions of feminism i.e. those centring on the circumstances of 'white, middle-class women' i.e.
#CharacterisationWhiteFeminism, and not on more generally on the feminism cause? Regardless, the obvious solution here is to reframe feminism in terms of
#TheorySociologyIntersectionalityFeminism (as outlined above).