@MarleyMarple [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : The last time we heard statements from the mouths of people like these, it resulted in 7 million gays, intellectuals, Jews, Muslims, and other non-white #woke people being transported to killing centers, gassed, & cremated with the usual genocide that flows from such hate speech. [URL redacted]
@JazmynWillard [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : There is one Phobia that Donald Trump, Jim Jordan and literally most Conservatives can't be buzz worded on.
This one belongs to the #Transmaffia and #Woke #DemocratCult exclusively
It's time these Deviants are mocked and not allowed to influence Society. They are a SMALL minority… [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@RileyKostyk [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : #Trumpism now is the #Mccarthyisme of 1950.
#JimJordon the new #McCarthy.
Do you all remember how it ended with #censuring by the #Senate?
Pity #GOP tries to ban teaching socalled #woke #History at schools, or is it by purpose?
#MAGA
#WeaponizationOfGovernment
#whisteblowers [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@BillTilkens [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : @EliseStefanik Just like that "Red Wave" in 2022, right Elise?
Y'all are #Traitors with absolutely nothing honest or intelligent to say. More Americans are becoming #Woke to the @GOP #Traitors heinous tactics & juvenile behaviors. [URL redacted]
"18 U.S. Code 2383. Whoever incites, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be...imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the US."
#2020_CapitolSiegeContexthttps://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2383
[1292]
Archived on 18 April 2023 at 8:00am [URL redacted]
@EmilioPooler [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: @NikkiHaley Anyone who now says #woke sounds like an i*diot and totally out of touch aka MAGA @GOP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP Jim Jordan, Mike Pence [URL redacted]
@TuckerSterrenberg [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : @Weaponization @Jim_Jordan @RepMikeJohnson #Woke is the fictitious @GOP boogieman. The joke is on #Republicans. [URL redacted]
#OrgClassifPPUSRepublicanPartyGOPJimJordan
#OrgUSFedFBI
#CharacterisationWhistleblower
#NMUSMSNBCChrisHayeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QgQBqy6HwYg
#MetaphorWeaponisationSupplementary #NewspaperUSBrdshtTheWashingtonPostJosephMenn "The Stanford Internet Observatory, which published some of the most influential analysis of the spread of false information on social media during elections, has shed most of its staff and may shut down amid political and legal attacks that have cast a pall on efforts to study online misinformation.
Just three staffers remain at the Observatory, and they will either leave or find roles at Stanford's Cyber Policy Center, which is absorbing what remains of the program, according to eight people familiar with the developments, some of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters.
The Election Integrity Partnership, a prominent consortium run by the Observatory and a University of Washington team to identify viral falsehoods about election procedures and outcomes in real time, has updated its webpage to say its work has concluded.
Two ongoing lawsuits and two congressional inquiries into the Observatory have cost Stanford millions of dollars in legal fees, one of the people told The Washington Post. Students and scholars affiliated with the program say they have been worn down by online attacks and harassment amid the heated political climate for misinformation research, as legislators threaten to cut federal funding to universities studying propaganda. ...
'Stanford remains deeply concerned about efforts, including lawsuits and congressional investigations, that chill freedom of inquiry and undermine legitimate and much needed academic research -- both at Stanford and across academia,' Mostofi added.
The study of misinformation has become increasingly controversial, and Stamos, DiResta and Starbird have been besieged by lawsuits, document requests and threats of physical harm. Leading the charge has been Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), whose House subcommittee alleges that the Observatory improperly worked with federal officials and social media companies to violate the free-speech rights of conservatives.
Jordan has demanded reams of documents from Stanford, including records of students discussing social media posts as they volunteered to help the Observatory, and Stamos testified before the House Judiciary Committee for eight hours.
'Free speech wins again!' Jordan posted on X on Friday, calling the Observatory part of a 'censorship regime.'" (14 June #2024_).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/06/14/stanford-internet-observatory-disinformation-research-lawsuits-politics/
#EDUUSStanfordUniversityStanfordInternetObservatory
#NarrativeTruthFalsehood
@DanAlibhai [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : @EliseStefanik @Jim_Jordan Describe #woke? We the Majority of Americans see it as a useful club for #MAGARepublicans, alt-right nationalists and fascists who want to beat those seeking justice over the head with #WhiteGrievancePolitics to win elections without deploying explicitly racist terms!… [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
#OrgClassifPPUSRepublicanPartyGOPEliseStefanik #OrgClassifPPUSRepublicanPartyGOPJimJordan #PleaMAGA #TheoryGrievancePolitics #PoliticsFascismNaziNeoFarRightAltRightRadicalRightSupplementary
#OrgIntlEuropeanConsortiumForPoliticalResearchECPRTheLoop
#EDUUKQueenMaryUniversityOfLondonTimBale "'Hard right' is a neologism that, unless I'm missing something, has little or no currency whatsoever among academic experts. Those experts like to call things exactly what they are - namely (following Cas Mudde) far right (the umbrella term) or one of its two variants: extreme right or (populist) radical right.
In their defence, journalists will talk about language evolving to cover new phenomena. This argument, however, seems to ignore the fact that both the extreme and populist radical-right variants of the far right have been around for decades. If this is the case, then why is it only recently that the new term has crept into media output?
Journalists have even suggested that 'populist radical right' is just too complex a term for their readers to understand. Why use three words when two will do? This is understandable in a headline, perhaps, but in an 800-word report or op-ed? I don't think so.
In reality, 'hard right' is less an evolution than a euphemism, effectively sanitising and normalising what it purports to describe. And the recent increase in its use doesn't seem to correlate with any deradicalisation among the parties that journalists are referring to. Instead, it correlates with growth in those parties' electoral support and their proximity to or entry into government. This all suggests that what's driving journalists' use of 'hard right' is their fear of losing access to precious sources were they to call it what it actually is. Or, given that Reform UK (successfully) threatened the BBC with legal action if it were to label the party 'far right', maybe journalists fear an even worse fate than that." https://theloop.ecpr.eu/why-we-need-to-halt-hard-right-in-its-tracks/
#IRLScientistPoliticalCasMudde
#LiteralNeologism
#PhenomnPopulism
#OrgClassifPPUKTheBrexitPartyReformUK
#NMUKBBC
@KentYencha [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : "#Cancel and #woke are the latest terms to originate in #BlackCulture where for years, they were sincere calls to consciousness and action or used as off-hand jokes, only to be appropriated into the #WhiteMainstream and subsequently thrashed to death." [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
@CadeIhnat [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : Your an IDIOT if you think we're idiots, donald trump, bill barr, jim jordan, all the rest of the fascist republicans. We've got your number you lying, lawless, corrpt dogs. We SEE you. You can't con your way out of what you are doing to our democracy anymore #WOKE!!! [URL redacted]