Archived Tweets / Research Data
Codes & Themes w/wo Theoretical Memos
(derived through a process of inductive, qualitative, data analysis)
@EmelyTrull [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : Her kommer Pippi..
Pippi er stærk og kan klare alt!
#dkpol #dkmedier #WokeCulture #woke [URL redacted]
[5]
@MathewBussy [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [03]: @ZubyMusic #woke #noble #freedom #justice #civil [URL redacted]
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/
#2017_EuropaTheLastBattle [imdb] [Wikipedia] by
#IRLFilmmakerTobiasBratt
#TheoryRevisionismHistorical
#PhenomnResponsibilityBlamingVictim
#ConspiracyTheory_NewWorldOrderNWO
#BeliefTheismJudaism
#PoliticsNationalismJewishZionism
#PoliticsCommunism
#PhenomnFrankfurtSchool
#AdvocacyUKFabianSociety https://fabians.org.uk/about-us/
#PoliticallyCorrectPC
#ConspiracyTheory_CulturalMarxism
#IRLHistoricalFigureKarlMarx
#PowerControlViolationPaedophilia
#1932_Holodomor
Context response to tweet (including a screen-shot) of page 24 of the #OrgUSFedFoodAndDrugAdministrationFDA [Government] 'Summary Basis for Regulatory Action' (8 November 2021) - downloadble from: [Government] i.e. "Moreover, since vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis is the most clinically significant identified risk, FDA undertook a quantitative benefit-risk assessment to model the excess risk of myocarditis/pericarditis vs. the expected benefits of preventing COVID- 19 and associated hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. For estimation of risk, the model took a conservative approach by relying on non-chart-confirmed cases from a US healthcare claims database (OPTUM) that could provide a control group and greater confidence in denominators for vaccine exposures. Thus, the estimates of excess risk in this model are higher than the rates estimated from reports to VAERS (an uncontrolled passive surveillance system), with an estimated excess risk approaching 200 cases per million vaccinated males 16-17 years of age (the age/sex-stratified group with the highest risk). For estimation of benefit, the model output was highly dependent on the assumed COVID-19 incidence, as well as assumptions about vaccine efficacy and duration of protection. The assessment therefore considered a range of scenarios including but not limited to a 'most likely' scenario associated with recent Delta variant surge and diminished vaccine effectiveness (70% overall, 80% against COVID-19 hospitalization) compared to that observed in the clinical trial. The 'worst-case' scenario with low COVID-19 incidence reflecting the July 2021 nadir and the same somewhat diminished vaccine effectiveness as in the 'most likely' scenario. For males and females 18 years of age and older and for females 16-17 years of age, even before accounting for morbidity prevented from non-hospitalized COVID-19, the model predicts that the benefits of prevented COVID-19 hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths would clearly outweigh the predicted excess risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis under all conditions examined. For males 16-17 years of age, the model predicts that the benefits of prevented COVID-19 hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths would clearly outweigh the predicted excess risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis under the 'most likely' scenario, but that predicted excess cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis would exceed COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths under the 'worst case' scenario. However, this predicted numerical imbalance does not account for the greater severity and length of hospitalization, on average, for COVID-19 compared with vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis. Additionally, the 'worst case' scenario model predicts prevention of >13,000 cases of non-hospitalized COVID-19 per million vaccinated males 16-17 years of age, which would include prevention of clinically significant morbidity and/or long-term sequelae associated with some of these cases. Finally, the model does not account for indirect societal/public health benefits of vaccination. Considering these additional factors, FDA concluded that even under the 'worst case' scenario the benefits of vaccination sufficiently outweigh risks to support approval of the vaccine in males 16-17 years of age." #OtheringOutGroupAntiVaxxer
Supplementary "CDC continues to recommend that everyone ages 5 years and older get vaccinated for COVID-19. The known risks of COVID-19 illness and its related, possibly severe complications, such as long-term health problems, hospitalization, and even death, far outweigh the potential risks of having a rare adverse reaction to vaccination, including the possible risk of myocarditis or pericarditis." [Government] #_Focal
Context response to tweet (including a screen-shot) of page 24 of the #OrgUSFedFoodAndDrugAdministrationFDA [Government] 'Summary Basis for Regulatory Action' (8 November 2021) - downloadble from: [Government] i.e. "Moreover, since vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis is the most clinically significant identified risk, FDA undertook a quantitative benefit-risk assessment to model the excess risk of myocarditis/pericarditis vs. the expected benefits of preventing COVID- 19 and associated hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths. For estimation of risk, the model took a conservative approach by relying on non-chart-confirmed cases from a US healthcare claims database (OPTUM) that could provide a control group and greater confidence in denominators for vaccine exposures. Thus, the estimates of excess risk in this model are higher than the rates estimated from reports to VAERS (an uncontrolled passive surveillance system), with an estimated excess risk approaching 200 cases per million vaccinated males 16-17 years of age (the age/sex-stratified group with the highest risk). For estimation of benefit, the model output was highly dependent on the assumed COVID-19 incidence, as well as assumptions about vaccine efficacy and duration of protection. The assessment therefore considered a range of scenarios including but not limited to a 'most likely' scenario associated with recent Delta variant surge and diminished vaccine effectiveness (70% overall, 80% against COVID-19 hospitalization) compared to that observed in the clinical trial. The 'worst-case' scenario with low COVID-19 incidence reflecting the July 2021 nadir and the same somewhat diminished vaccine effectiveness as in the 'most likely' scenario. For males and females 18 years of age and older and for females 16-17 years of age, even before accounting for morbidity prevented from non-hospitalized COVID-19, the model predicts that the benefits of prevented COVID-19 hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths would clearly outweigh the predicted excess risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis under all conditions examined. For males 16-17 years of age, the model predicts that the benefits of prevented COVID-19 hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths would clearly outweigh the predicted excess risk of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis under the 'most likely' scenario, but that predicted excess cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis would exceed COVID-19 hospitalizations and deaths under the 'worst case' scenario. However, this predicted numerical imbalance does not account for the greater severity and length of hospitalization, on average, for COVID-19 compared with vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis. Additionally, the 'worst case' scenario model predicts prevention of >13,000 cases of non-hospitalized COVID-19 per million vaccinated males 16-17 years of age, which would include prevention of clinically significant morbidity and/or long-term sequelae associated with some of these cases. Finally, the model does not account for indirect societal/public health benefits of vaccination. Considering these additional factors, FDA concluded that even under the 'worst case' scenario the benefits of vaccination sufficiently outweigh risks to support approval of the vaccine in males 16-17 years of age." #OtheringOutGroupAntiVaxxer
Supplementary "CDC continues to recommend that everyone ages 5 years and older get vaccinated for COVID-19. The known risks of COVID-19 illness and its related, possibly severe complications, such as long-term health problems, hospitalization, and even death, far outweigh the potential risks of having a rare adverse reaction to vaccination, including the possible risk of myocarditis or pericarditis." [Government] #_Focal
"'WE DO NOT SAY THAT ONE RACE IS SUPERIOR TO ANOTHER, BUT WE DO SAY THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE VARIOUS RACES OF THE WORLD.' PROF. DR. W. GROSS, DIRECTOR OF THE RACIAL POLICY OFFICE OF THE NSDAP"
#PoliticsFascismNaziPartyWalterGross [Wikipedia]
#PoliticsFascismNazi
#MetaphorPurityRace
"'GERMAN-RACIALISM HAS BEEN DELIBERATELY DISTORTED. IT NEVER WAS ANTI-'OTHER RACE' RACIALISM.
IT WAS A PRO-GERMAN RACIALISM. IT WAS CONCERNED WITH
MAKING THE GERMAN RACE STRONG AND HEALTHY IN EVERY WAY.
HITLER WAS NOT INTERESTED IN HAVING MILLIONS OF DEGENERATES. IF IT WAS HIS POWER NOT TO HAVE THEM. TODAY ONE FINDS RAMPANT ALCOHOL AND DRUG ADDICTION EVERYWHERE. HITLER CARED THAT THE GERMAN FAMILIES BE HEALTHY, CARED THAT THEY RAISE HEALTHY CHILDREN FOR THE RENEWAL OF A HEALTHY NATION.
GERMAN RACIALISM MEANT RE-DISCOVERING THE CREATIVE VALUES OF THEIR OWN RACE, RE-DISCOVERING THEIR CULTURE. IT WAS A SEARCH FOR EXCELLENCE, A NOBLE IDEAL.
NATIONAL SOCIALIST RACIALISM WAS NOT AGAINST THE OTHER RACES. IT WAS FOR ITS OWN RACE. IT AIMED AT DEFENDING AND IMPROVING ITS RACE. AND WISHED THAT ALL OTHER RACES DID THE SAME FOR THEMSELVES (...) NATIONAL SOCIALIST RACIALISM WAS LOYAL TO THE GERMAN RACE AND TOTALLY RESPECTED ALL OTHER RACES.'
LEON DEGRELLE"
#PoliticsFascismNaziCollaboratorLeonDegrelle
#BeliefPseudoscienceScientificRacism
"'RESPECT THE MAN OF NOBLE RACES OTHER THAN YOUR OWN, WHO CARRIES OUT, IN A DIFFERENT PLACE, A COMBAT PARALLEL TO YOURS -- TO OURS. HE IS YOUR ALLY. HE IS OUR ALLY, BE HE AT THE OTHER END OF THE WORLD.' 'I'M FOR A MULTI-RACIAL WORLD IN WHICH EACH RACE KEEPS TO ITSELF, IN HARMONY WITH THE OTHER RACES. LIKE IN A GARDEN, YOU HAVE FLOWERBEDS OF ROSES AND FLOWERBEDS OF CARNATIONS AND IRISES AND DIFFERENT OTHER FLOWERS. THEY DON'T INTERMARRY. THEY STAY SEPARATE, AND EACH ONE HAS ITS BEAUTY'
SAVITRI DEVI"
#PoliticsFascismNaziSympathizerSavitriDevi
#PowerControlSegregationEthnopluralism [Wikipedia]
#PoliticsNationalismWhite
Supplementary #NMEENommeTV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvIfk7TSB1Q via #ToponymEuropeEstonia.n Nõmme TV [Wikipedia] #MetaphorVersusCompetitionCooperation http://www.tacticalmediafiles.net/videos/45022/Meme-Wars_-Internet-culture-and-the-_alt_right_-
Similar use of the #MetaphorGardenGardener, this time by #IRLComedianRosieHolt's #PhenomnSatire of #OrgClassifPPUKConservativePartyLizTruss and #OrgClassifPPUKConservativePartyKwasiKwarteng's #2022_UKGovernmentMiniBudget: "We're not trickling down. We are watering a whole garden. Selectively. If you're watering a garden, do you water everything in it? Some would argue yes, but I would say no. You water the lovely flowers and not the weeds." [tweet] #PhenomnSatire #MetaphorSpatialTrickleDownEconomics [Wikipedia] [Reuters fact-checked]
Addendum very reminiscent of arguments for #PowerControlSegregationApartheid such as: "In January 1944, D. F. Malan, speaking as Leader of the Opposition, became the first person to employ it in the South African parliament. A few months later he elaborated, 'I do not use the term 'segregation', because it has been interpreted as a fencing off (afhok), but rather 'apartheid', which will give the various races the opportunity of uplifting themselves on the basis of what is their own.'" (Giliomee, 2003, p. 374). Giliomee, H., 2003. 'The Making of the Apartheid Plan, 1929-1948*'. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(2), pp.373-392 [academic source] #IRLHistoricalFigureDanielMalan #ToponymAfricaSouthernSouthAfrica
Supplementary #NMEENommeTV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvIfk7TSB1Q via #ToponymEuropeEstonia.n Nõmme TV [Wikipedia] #MetaphorVersusCompetitionCooperation http://www.tacticalmediafiles.net/videos/45022/Meme-Wars_-Internet-culture-and-the-_alt_right_-
Similar use of the #MetaphorGardenGardener, this time by #IRLComedianRosieHolt's #PhenomnSatire of #OrgClassifPPUKConservativePartyLizTruss and #OrgClassifPPUKConservativePartyKwasiKwarteng's #2022_UKGovernmentMiniBudget: "We're not trickling down. We are watering a whole garden. Selectively. If you're watering a garden, do you water everything in it? Some would argue yes, but I would say no. You water the lovely flowers and not the weeds." [tweet] #PhenomnSatire #MetaphorSpatialTrickleDownEconomics [Wikipedia] [Reuters fact-checked]
Addendum very reminiscent of arguments for #PowerControlSegregationApartheid such as: "In January 1944, D. F. Malan, speaking as Leader of the Opposition, became the first person to employ it in the South African parliament. A few months later he elaborated, 'I do not use the term 'segregation', because it has been interpreted as a fencing off (afhok), but rather 'apartheid', which will give the various races the opportunity of uplifting themselves on the basis of what is their own.'" (Giliomee, 2003, p. 374). Giliomee, H., 2003. 'The Making of the Apartheid Plan, 1929-1948*'. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(2), pp.373-392 [academic source] #IRLHistoricalFigureDanielMalan #ToponymAfricaSouthernSouthAfrica
"I PROMISE YOU, I AM QUITE FREE FROM ALL RACIAL HATRED. IT'S IN ANY CASE, UNDESIRABLE THAT ONE RACE SHOULD MIX WITH ANOTHER... PRIDE IN ONE'S OWN RACE -AND THAT DOES NOT IMPLY CONTEMPT FOR OTHER RACES - IS ALSO A NORMAL AND HEALTHY SENTIMENT. I HAVE NEVER REGARDED THE CHINESE OR THE JAPANESE AS BEING INFERIOR TO OURSELVES. THEY BELONG TO ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS, AND I ADMIT FREELY THAT THEIR PAST HISTORY IS SUPERIOR TO OUR OWN. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE PROUD OF THEIR PAST, JUST AS WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE PROUD OF THE CIVILIZATION TO WHICH WE BELONG.
INDEED, I BELIEVE THE MORE STEADFAST THE CHINESE AND THE JAPANESE REMAIN IN THEIR PRIDE OF RACE - THE EASIER I SHALL FIND IT TO GET ON WITH THEM.'
'DIFFERENTIATION OF TREATMENT IS NOT MOTIVATED BY THE DIFFERENCE OF VALUE OF THE TWO RACES, BUT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE OF THEIR RESPECTIVE NATURES.'
ADOLF HITLER"
#PoliticsFascismNaziPartyAdolfHitler
#PowerControlPopulationEugenics
[1619]