Archived Tweets / Research Data
Codes & Themes w/wo Theoretical Memos
(derived through a process of inductive, qualitative, data analysis)
#OtheringOutGroupTransgressiveDeviant (women that seemingly have
#TVKingOfTheHill
#PhenomnBodyAdornmentTattoo.s).
#TheoryCodedFemininityUn i.e. 'unfeminine'
#OtheringHateMisogyny
#CharacterisationEmasculationIndeterminacyEpicene
#TheoryIntergroupBias
Context #PowerControlRegulationObjectification [encyclopædia] #TheoryFeministMaleGaze
Context #PowerControlRegulationObjectification [encyclopædia] #TheoryFeministMaleGaze
[269]
@MahinaLansburg [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [14]: @autiesapphic The writing was ideology first and story MIA. Jodie's acting was even worse. Graham tells about his fear of Cancer, she has nothing to say. She fully signed up to the #woke agenda before day 1. Good riddance to bad rubbish. [URL redacted]
#MagazineUSNewYorkVultureDevonIvie "It's not the Doctor's response, it's other people's response. And as a woman, that's often the thing: We're not surprised we can achieve things as women, it's often other people who are.
I had the same thought after watching the premiere. Modern-day Britain is one thing, but what if the Doctor materializes in the European Dark Ages?
Exactly. What Chris wanted to do, particularly in the cast and in the story, is reflect the world we live in today. Very often, we're only seeing stories being told through the white male gaze. That's what Doctor Who always celebrated. The backlash is always the thing that gets focused on, but really, it's so small. And also, for a true fan, they know it's not warranted.
It's one thing to have an anonymous Twitterbot spew stupid, misogynistic stuff about your casting, but when a former Doctor Peter Davison says he has doubts because it's a 'loss of a role model for boys,' does that give you pause?
I feel for him, because I feel he was misinterpreted. I don't think it was a true reflection of what he was trying to say. Regardless of what was said, the mythology of 'boys can only look up to boys' whereas 'women are expected to look up to men'" https://www.vulture.com/2018/10/jodie-whittaker-doctor-who-season-11.html #TheoryFeministMaleGaze #IRLActorPeterDavison
[34]
[14]
@JaylaPortaro [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : ‘Misogyny’ alert for art lovers after scrutiny of Manet painting
Courtauld accused of wantonly #woke gesture as work’s male presence said to have ‘unsettling’ effect [URL redacted]
#OtheringHateMisogyny #EDUUKUniversityOfLondonCourtauldInstituteOfArt
Context #NewspaperUKBrdshtTheTelegraphCraigSimpson "The 'male gaze' in a Manet masterpiece has been highlighted by the Courtauld Gallery after curators introduced new labels addressing 'misogyny' in art. ... Manet's masterpiece, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, has been reinterpreted with a new label which suggests that the painting has an 'unsettling' quality, because of the presence of a man on the canvas. The 1882 work depicts a barmaid staring out at the viewer of the painting and - in a mirrored image - towards a male patron of the eponymous Folies-Bergère (a Parisian cabaret club) who returns her gaze. The masterpiece has been relabelled to suggest the presence of a man gives it an 'unsettling quality' The 1882 work depicts a barmaid staring out at the viewer of the painting and - in a mirrored image - towards a male patron of the eponymous Folies-Bergère The female subject's 'enigmatic expression is unsettling', a new information panel states, 'especially as she appears to be interacting with a male customer'. The suggestion that an 'unsettling' quality of the painting is enhanced because the woman talking to a man has been criticised for unwitting 'misogyny', because it diminishes the position of the female model in the work." #TheoryFeministMaleGaze
Supplementary https://courtauld.ac.uk/highlights/a-bar-at-the-folies-bergere/
Context #NewspaperUKBrdshtTheTelegraphCraigSimpson "The 'male gaze' in a Manet masterpiece has been highlighted by the Courtauld Gallery after curators introduced new labels addressing 'misogyny' in art. ... Manet's masterpiece, A Bar at the Folies-Bergère, has been reinterpreted with a new label which suggests that the painting has an 'unsettling' quality, because of the presence of a man on the canvas. The 1882 work depicts a barmaid staring out at the viewer of the painting and - in a mirrored image - towards a male patron of the eponymous Folies-Bergère (a Parisian cabaret club) who returns her gaze. The masterpiece has been relabelled to suggest the presence of a man gives it an 'unsettling quality' The 1882 work depicts a barmaid staring out at the viewer of the painting and - in a mirrored image - towards a male patron of the eponymous Folies-Bergère The female subject's 'enigmatic expression is unsettling', a new information panel states, 'especially as she appears to be interacting with a male customer'. The suggestion that an 'unsettling' quality of the painting is enhanced because the woman talking to a man has been criticised for unwitting 'misogyny', because it diminishes the position of the female model in the work." #TheoryFeministMaleGaze
Supplementary https://courtauld.ac.uk/highlights/a-bar-at-the-folies-bergere/
[72]