Archived Tweets / Research Data
Codes & Themes w/wo Theoretical Memos
(derived through a process of inductive, qualitative, data analysis)
@EmersonMackiewicz [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: #Hypocrisy Show it: #postmodernists #neoliberals #ultraleftists #leftists #neomarxists #environmentalists #scientists #capitalists #globalists #transnationalists
#woke #Fascists
#ClimateEmergency #climatologists #globalwarming #climatechange #elonmusk @elonmusk @GretaThunberg [URL redacted]
#EpistemologyAgnotology
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionPerceivedRiskFunctional
#TheoryPerformativeActivismGreenwashing
Supplementary #NMUKBBCGeorginaKenyon "Consider climate change as an example. 'The fight is not just over the existence of climate change, it's over whether God has created the Earth for us to exploit, whether government has the right to regulate industry, whether environmentalists should be empowered, and so on. It's not just about the facts, it's about what is imagined to flow from and into such facts,' says Proctor." https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160105-the-man-who-studies-the-spread-of-ignorance #EDUUSStanfordUniversityRobertProctor #PhenomnClimateChange
Supplementary #NMUKBBCGeorginaKenyon "Consider climate change as an example. 'The fight is not just over the existence of climate change, it's over whether God has created the Earth for us to exploit, whether government has the right to regulate industry, whether environmentalists should be empowered, and so on. It's not just about the facts, it's about what is imagined to flow from and into such facts,' says Proctor." https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160105-the-man-who-studies-the-spread-of-ignorance #EDUUSStanfordUniversityRobertProctor #PhenomnClimateChange
[1185]
@ShelbyHaimes [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: De #Woke idiotie en de klimaat hysterie kennen een grootste gemene deler.
Wie zich daarvoor niet willen lenen, moeten blijkbaar ‘gecanselled’ worden.
Feiten doen er niet toe, misplaatst sentiment des te meer.
Een bizar klimaat scenario misbruiken als baseline bv 🤷♂️ [URL redacted]
[107]
@DrewSchlosser [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : @joerogan getting #woke. Get ready, they're gonna come for you bro.
[URL redacted]
[162]
@KyleighLemmond [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [03]: @TrueNorthCentre It's so ironic that this billboard is in #woke #green #bcpoli [URL redacted] #ClimateDiversityIsOurStrength #cdnpoli [URL redacted]
#AdvocacyCACanadaFriendsOfScience
#IRLDogmatistMichelleStirling
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXYyCWX2uYY summarises her contra argument to a a paper by
#IRLScholarSethWynes
#IRLScholarKimberlyNicholas, which reveals issues with Canadian secondary science curricula https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0218305 Significantly, Stirling's paper https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3428789 and video clip seek to
#PloyManufacturingDoubt_
#EpistemologyAgnotology about the certainty of scientific consensus that
#PhenomnClimateChange poses severe risks to human and natural systems. And the 'Friends of Science' organisation is a classic example of
#TheoryPerformativeActivismAstroturfing [Folksonomy]
#PhenomnRealityFalsifying
"One container ship puts out the pollution of 50 million cars; A large container ship emits the carbon dioxide (CO2) of 20,000 cars."
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionPerceivedRiskFinancial
[203]
@AvaDiab [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: hey .@duckduckgo the point of me changing to you was to not be force-fed #woke #propaganda
not only did you #gowokegetbroke like #google but you are nowhere as good as them in your search coverage
I can't believe you promote yourselves as alternatives to google. you're the same [URL redacted]
#PleaGetGoWokeGoBroke
#PhenomnPropaganda
In this case, the search engine
#BrandTechDuckDuckGo is seen to have succumbed to the same impulses of
#BrandTechGoogle i.e. to present weighted search returns.
Supplementary this perspective is discussed by #IRLScholarFrancescaTripodi in terms of the practice of #EpistemologyAmateurExegeteScripturalInference: "I argue that practices learned in Bible study are applied to media interpretation. The conservatives I observed all hold the belief that certain fundamental truths exist, and they critically interrogate media messages in the same way they approach the Bible, focusing on specific passages and comparing what they read, see, and hear to their lived experiences. I term this media interrogation process scriptural inference, whereby audiences apply the technique of closely reading 'the Word' to other documents. I argue that these practices are a style of media literacy, whereby those who believe in the truth of the Bible approach secular political documents (e.g., a transcript of the president's speech or a copy of the Constitution) with the same interpretative scrutiny. Through this practice of unpacking texts, inconsistencies between an interpretation of original documents and the stories produced by MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and The Washington Post are easy to find. Such findings further support their widely shared belief that mainstream media cannot be trusted" (p.6). #PhenomnAlgorithm #ReasoningFallacyBiasCognitiveConfirmation #EpistemologyAmateurExegeteGooglingStuffAsResearch #BeliefTheismChristianityBible #NarrativeTruthImmutableUniversalIncontrovertibleAbsolute #BeliefTheismChristianityBibleScripture #TheoryConstitutionalLawOriginalism #NMUSMSNBC #NMUSCNN #NMUSFOXFNC #NewspaperUSBrdshtTheWallStreetJournal #NewspaperUSBrdshtNewYorkTimes #NewspaperUSBrdshtTheWashingtonPost #WebsitePragerU #IRLCommentatorDaveRubin #BrandTheDailyWire
Addendum implicit belief in the impartiality of search algorithms (and their corruption by their providers) i.e. "algorithms are implicitly neutral, it's the people that make them that give them an agenda". #PleaNeutrality
Supplementary this perspective is discussed by #IRLScholarFrancescaTripodi in terms of the practice of #EpistemologyAmateurExegeteScripturalInference: "I argue that practices learned in Bible study are applied to media interpretation. The conservatives I observed all hold the belief that certain fundamental truths exist, and they critically interrogate media messages in the same way they approach the Bible, focusing on specific passages and comparing what they read, see, and hear to their lived experiences. I term this media interrogation process scriptural inference, whereby audiences apply the technique of closely reading 'the Word' to other documents. I argue that these practices are a style of media literacy, whereby those who believe in the truth of the Bible approach secular political documents (e.g., a transcript of the president's speech or a copy of the Constitution) with the same interpretative scrutiny. Through this practice of unpacking texts, inconsistencies between an interpretation of original documents and the stories produced by MSNBC, CNN, Fox News, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and The Washington Post are easy to find. Such findings further support their widely shared belief that mainstream media cannot be trusted" (p.6). #PhenomnAlgorithm #ReasoningFallacyBiasCognitiveConfirmation #EpistemologyAmateurExegeteGooglingStuffAsResearch #BeliefTheismChristianityBible #NarrativeTruthImmutableUniversalIncontrovertibleAbsolute #BeliefTheismChristianityBibleScripture #TheoryConstitutionalLawOriginalism #NMUSMSNBC #NMUSCNN #NMUSFOXFNC #NewspaperUSBrdshtTheWallStreetJournal #NewspaperUSBrdshtNewYorkTimes #NewspaperUSBrdshtTheWashingtonPost #WebsitePragerU #IRLCommentatorDaveRubin #BrandTheDailyWire
Addendum implicit belief in the impartiality of search algorithms (and their corruption by their providers) i.e. "algorithms are implicitly neutral, it's the people that make them that give them an agenda". #PleaNeutrality
#2006_Idiocracy
Addendum #EpistemologyAgnotology i.e. "deliberate, culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, typically to sell a product or win favour, particularly through the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data" [Wikipedia] ?
Addendum #EpistemologyAgnotology i.e. "deliberate, culturally-induced ignorance or doubt, typically to sell a product or win favour, particularly through the publication of inaccurate or misleading scientific data" [Wikipedia] ?
[1735]