@AmberEdalgo [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : Fox: What's happened to my habitat?
Humans: We need to protect the environment using solar!
@jordanbpeterson
@GretaThunberg
@FriendsOfGreta
#solarenergy #woke #solarpanels #ClimateScam #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis #solarfraud [URL redacted]
@JaelynDefiesta [name pseudonymized] [ontology] : Latest fuel arriving to power electric cars in Germany.
Go you guys! Moral superiority one-oh-one.
#ElectricVehicles
#woke #ClimateEmergency #ClimateScam #GretaThunberg @CarolineLucas @GretaThunberg [URL redacted]
@AgnesValeri [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [02]: @optimiste33 @JBosley_13 @derniere_renov C'est du #woke à la @jmblanquer ou du iel à la @sandrousseau ??? #MacronardsFM [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: @DrChrisNewman @DoctorsXr @XRLondon @JustStop_Oil @UKHealthClimate #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam #NoGreens #ZeroGreens @Bowenchris
#everthingWOKEturnstoshit #banWOKE #outlawWOKE #wokenonace #WOKEoutofcontrol
This is how the general public see Climate Alarmists [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam #NoGreens #ZeroGreens @Bowenchris
When towing this thing is flat out travelling 160klm even when not towing it doesn't have the range for the distance between lots of towns. EV = Useless [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam #NoGreens #ZeroGreens @Bowenchris
They have that the wrong way around [URL redacted] [URL redacted]
"The notion that CO2 drives climate change is junk
The reason for this is simple, the notion that Co2 drives global warming is unfounded despite claims made by many today.
Heat is kinetic energy, the energy of motion it does not get trapped by CO2 because it's a gas.
Yet this is the theory pushed by many climate change scientists.
To describe the impact of CO2 as being like a greenhouse is farcical. A greenhouse works by using a solid object to trap convection before the air cools and condenses. CO2 is not a solid object.
CO2 absorbs and emits radiation. It does not trap convection. Furthermore it absorbs and emits incoming radiation at 2.8 microns while only absorbing outgoing radiation at 14.8 microns.
Applying planks rule e=hv, the incoming radiation absorbed by CO2 is 5 times more powerful than the outgoing radiation absorbed.
Regardless, as Einstein said in 1917, the amount of energy transferred by radiation is so small it always drops out.
The most powerful form of heat transfer in the atmosphere is convection which is governed by the second law of thermodynamics. The entropy of a system must always increase.
As such hot air will rise not fall. Outer space is negative 270 degrees Celsius. Our atmosphere is always losing heat because of this differential. (Thanks to Senator Gerard Rennick)
It's also alleged that renewables are 'cheaper than fossil fuels.' But this is misleading as green energy receives massive government subsidies and the cost of manufacture and installation are not included in official figures.
It has been estimated that the world, mainly industrialised nations have spent somewhere between 750,000 billion to one trillion dollars on trying to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. This includes building and installing 341,000 wind turbines and huge solar projects.
In over 30 years humanity has not succeeded in reducing CO2 levels as they have gone from 338ppm in 1980 to over 418ppm today. And what has happened? Nothing of consequence. Data shows that extreme weather events have DECLINED sharply; sea levels have remained stable as have ice coverage over the planet (Professor Ivan Frolov (Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas, Centennial Ice Cover Observations.)"
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2
#PhenomnEnergyRenewableGreenEnergy
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionDiscredenceDenial
Ivan Frolov (2009). ' Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas: Centennial Ice Cover Observations' https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-85875-1
[1241]
Archived on 22 September 2022 at 9:00pm [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam #NoGreens #ZeroGreens
Remember the idiot who said our dams would never fill again! Another Climate Idiot who got it wrong. [URL redacted]
"I invited a climate scientist to explain the risk of climate change to our company.
Then we measure changes in temperature and CO2 over time.
Human activity is warming the earth and will lead to a global catastrophe.
We put that data into dozens of different climate models and ignore the ones that look wrong to us.
Then we take that output and run it through long-term economic models of the sort that have never been right.
How do scientists know that?
What if I don't trust the economic models?
Who hired the science denier?
It's easy. We start with the basic science of physics and chemistry."
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2 #PhenomnClimateChangeCatastrophe #PhenomnClimateChangeAnthropogenic #CaricaturistScottAdamsAKADilbert
[1149]
Archived on 17 September 2022 at 8:30pm [URL redacted]
"The notion that CO2 drives climate change is junk
The reason for this is simple, the notion that Co2 drives global warming is unfounded despite claims made by many today.
Heat is kinetic energy, the energy of motion it does not get trapped by CO2 because it's a gas.
Yet this is the theory pushed by many climate change scientists.
To describe the impact of CO2 as being like a greenhouse is farcical. A greenhouse works by using a solid object to trap convection before the air cools and condenses. CO2 is not a solid object.
CO2 absorbs and emits radiation. It does not trap convection. Furthermore it absorbs and emits incoming radiation at 2.8 microns while only absorbing outgoing radiation at 14.8 microns.
Applying planks rule e=hv, the incoming radiation absorbed by CO2 is 5 times more powerful than the outgoing radiation absorbed.
Regardless, as Einstein said in 1917, the amount of energy transferred by radiation is so small it always drops out.
The most powerful form of heat transfer in the atmosphere is convection which is governed by the second law of thermodynamics. The entropy of a system must always increase.
As such hot air will rise not fall. Outer space is negative 270 degrees Celsius. Our atmosphere is always losing heat because of this differential. (Thanks to Senator Gerard Rennick)
It's also alleged that renewables are 'cheaper than fossil fuels.' But this is misleading as green energy receives massive government subsidies and the cost of manufacture and installation are not included in official figures.
It has been estimated that the world, mainly industrialised nations have spent somewhere between 750,000 billion to one trillion dollars on trying to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. This includes building and installing 341,000 wind turbines and huge solar projects.
In over 30 years humanity has not succeeded in reducing CO2 levels as they have gone from 338ppm in 1980 to over 418ppm today. And what has happened? Nothing of consequence. Data shows that extreme weather events have DECLINED sharply; sea levels have remained stable as have ice coverage over the planet (Professor Ivan Frolov (Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas, Centennial Ice Cover Observations.)"
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2
#PhenomnEnergyRenewableGreenEnergy
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionDiscredenceDenial
Ivan Frolov (2009). ' Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas: Centennial Ice Cover Observations' https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-85875-1
[1194]
Archived on 17 September 2022 at 12:00am [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: @AdamBandt @MehreenFaruqi You and your party are a disgrace. #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam #NoGreens #ZeroGreens [URL redacted]
"The notion that CO2 drives climate change is junk
The reason for this is simple, the notion that Co2 drives global warming is unfounded despite claims made by many today.
Heat is kinetic energy, the energy of motion it does not get trapped by CO2 because it's a gas.
Yet this is the theory pushed by many climate change scientists.
To describe the impact of CO2 as being like a greenhouse is farcical. A greenhouse works by using a solid object to trap convection before the air cools and condenses. CO2 is not a solid object.
CO2 absorbs and emits radiation. It does not trap convection. Furthermore it absorbs and emits incoming radiation at 2.8 microns while only absorbing outgoing radiation at 14.8 microns.
Applying planks rule e=hv, the incoming radiation absorbed by CO2 is 5 times more powerful than the outgoing radiation absorbed.
Regardless, as Einstein said in 1917, the amount of energy transferred by radiation is so small it always drops out.
The most powerful form of heat transfer in the atmosphere is convection which is governed by the second law of thermodynamics. The entropy of a system must always increase.
As such hot air will rise not fall. Outer space is negative 270 degrees Celsius. Our atmosphere is always losing heat because of this differential. (Thanks to Senator Gerard Rennick)
It's also alleged that renewables are 'cheaper than fossil fuels.' But this is misleading as green energy receives massive government subsidies and the cost of manufacture and installation are not included in official figures.
It has been estimated that the world, mainly industrialised nations have spent somewhere between 750,000 billion to one trillion dollars on trying to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. This includes building and installing 341,000 wind turbines and huge solar projects.
In over 30 years humanity has not succeeded in reducing CO2 levels as they have gone from 338ppm in 1980 to over 418ppm today. And what has happened? Nothing of consequence. Data shows that extreme weather events have DECLINED sharply; sea levels have remained stable as have ice coverage over the planet (Professor Ivan Frolov (Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas, Centennial Ice Cover Observations.)"
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2
#PhenomnEnergyRenewableGreenEnergy
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionDiscredenceDenial
Ivan Frolov (2009). ' Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas: Centennial Ice Cover Observations' https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-85875-1
[1090]
Archived on 12 September 2022 at 12:00am [URL redacted]
"The notion that CO2 drives climate change is junk
The reason for this is simple, the notion that Co2 drives global warming is unfounded despite claims made by many today.
Heat is kinetic energy, the energy of motion it does not get trapped by CO2 because it's a gas.
Yet this is the theory pushed by many climate change scientists.
To describe the impact of CO2 as being like a greenhouse is farcical. A greenhouse works by using a solid object to trap convection before the air cools and condenses. CO2 is not a solid object.
CO2 absorbs and emits radiation. It does not trap convection. Furthermore it absorbs and emits incoming radiation at 2.8 microns while only absorbing outgoing radiation at 14.8 microns.
Applying planks rule e=hv, the incoming radiation absorbed by CO2 is 5 times more powerful than the outgoing radiation absorbed.
Regardless, as Einstein said in 1917, the amount of energy transferred by radiation is so small it always drops out.
The most powerful form of heat transfer in the atmosphere is convection which is governed by the second law of thermodynamics. The entropy of a system must always increase.
As such hot air will rise not fall. Outer space is negative 270 degrees Celsius. Our atmosphere is always losing heat because of this differential. (Thanks to Senator Gerard Rennick)
It's also alleged that renewables are 'cheaper than fossil fuels.' But this is misleading as green energy receives massive government subsidies and the cost of manufacture and installation are not included in official figures.
It has been estimated that the world, mainly industrialised nations have spent somewhere between 750,000 billion to one trillion dollars on trying to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere. This includes building and installing 341,000 wind turbines and huge solar projects.
In over 30 years humanity has not succeeded in reducing CO2 levels as they have gone from 338ppm in 1980 to over 418ppm today. And what has happened? Nothing of consequence. Data shows that extreme weather events have DECLINED sharply; sea levels have remained stable as have ice coverage over the planet (Professor Ivan Frolov (Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas, Centennial Ice Cover Observations.)"
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2 #PhenomnEnergyRenewableGreenEnergy
#TheoryDragonsOfInactionDiscredenceDenial
Ivan Frolov (2009). ' Climate Change in Eurasian Arctic Shelf Seas: Centennial Ice Cover Observations' https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-85875-1
[1090]
Archived on 11 September 2022 at 2:00am [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: @SenatorWong #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis
@AlboMP #WOKE #ClimateScam
Climate change is a natural event and no amount of Taxes will change that [URL redacted]
"I'm here interviewing Planet Earth today. Hi there!
Hello
Apparently you've been Greening a lot recently. How come?
Yes, it's all this extra CO2!
CO2?! But, but that's bad surely?
No! It's food for all my veg! I love CO2!
CUT! CUT! WE CAN'T USE
##### THIS!!
But I thought you wanted a greener planet....
JOSH16"
#LiteralSubstanceGasCO2
#WebsiteNetZeroWatch ?
#CaricaturistAKACartoonsByJosh ?
#2016_
[860]
Archived on 25 August 2022 at 6:15am [URL redacted]
@BellaRones [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [337]: #NetZeroCarbon #ClimateEmergency #ClimateCrisis @AlboMP Stop this stupid EV push it won't work in Australian. It will only work for inner City #WOKE Latte sipping wankers. [URL redacted]
@CharityDanell [name pseudonymized] [ontology] [03]: @Bulldog665 @DVATW Good enough to get the Left and #Woke to bully @BorisJohnson into more free stuff for migrants! Free NHS. Now they’re asking for free TV licences, etc. Free means we pay or service reduces. Don’t moan about delay for your hip replacement, cataracts, etc. If you cheered for this! [URL redacted]
#PhenomnVirusCOVID19Pandemic
#LiteralFieldEconomicsRecession
#SymbolEmblemFlagUKUnionJack
#MetaphorVersusCostPandemicMitigation
#PhenomnVirusCOVID19PandemicMitigationHandWashing
#NewspaperCABrdshtTheHamiltonSpectator[Wikipedia]
#CaricaturistGraemeMacKayhttps://mackaycartoons.net/2020/03/18/wednesday-march-11-2020/Context
#EDUUSWilliamCareyInternationalUniversityEdenVigilLowellBliss "The Unemployed Climate Activist (henceforth called a 'UCA') is a term that I coined after the release of a recent Harris Poll of Americans which shows that concerns about climate change has plummeted. Whereas in December 2019, climate change registered first among the most important issues facing society, now it is considered second-to-last on a list of a dozen concerns. So, where am I supposed to position myself, a UCA, in MacKay's cartoon? I too am based in Canada on that vulnerable stretch of sand bar. I too feel the threat of the pandemic and the recession. But as a climate activist, is it my job to climb to the top of his sandcastled CN Tower and yell out to Canadians, 'Now, as I was saying about global warming . . .'? There are a number of features in MacKay's cartoon that a climate activist would find familiar. I feel the vulnerability of our cities in the face of sea-level rise and other climate change impacts. I have agonized over the immensity of those impacts, racing toward our shores 'about to wreak havoc on humanity.' Small individual measures--like handwashing during a pandemic, or recycling during an ecological crisis--are important, but are not commensurate responses to the impending challenges. Every climate activist knows we also need action on the governmental and global level. We need to go big and go fast. But how is my voice on climate change to be heard above the crash of the immediate COVID-19 and recession waves?" https://www.edenvigil.org/eden-vigil-blog/2020/8/19/the-confused-cartoonist-and-the-unemployed-climate-activist[jpg]
#MetaphorSpatialStormTsunami
#SymbolEmblemFlagCACanada
#ToponymAmericaNorthCanada
#MagazineFortuneWillJohnson "Battered by pandemic and economic collapse, do Americans have the capacity to care about the environment? Not so much, judging by a national poll we just conducted.
We asked a panel of U.S. adults a series of questions about today's most crucial issues, environmental policy options, and their own behavior. In all three categories, I was personally surprised and discouraged to discover that our devotion to the world around us is flagging.
In a survey we at the Harris Poll conducted last December, American adults said climate change was the number one issue facing society. Today, it comes in second to last on a list of a dozen options, ahead of only overpopulation. Among Gen X men, in fact, more than third dismiss climate change as unimportant. COVID-19 and the recession have, of course, reordered priorities around the world. Still, the coronavirus didn't elbow aside other issues as muscularly as it did climate change. (Incidentally, global warming is a bigger concern to retirement-age women than any other age group except millennial men.)" https://fortune.com/2020/08/10/climate-change-global-warming-coronavirus/
#PhenomnClimateChangeEmergency